No difference was found in patient reported outcome measures, ROM, implant positioning, and survivorship.Įarly accurate detection of crop disease is extremely important for timely disease management. The FB group demonstrated shorted surgical time. The Kaplan–Meier Curve found no differences in implant survivorship.Īccording to the main findings of the present clinical trial, MB implants performed similar to FB in PKA in octogenarians. Four failures were observed in the MB cohort: two for bearing dislocation and two for aseptic loosening. At last follow-up, FB group reported three failures caused by aseptic loosening. No difference was found in implant positioning (p > 0.05). The surgical time was shorter in the FB group (p 0.05). Furthermore, the following radiographic parameters were measured: Femoral component varus/valgus Tibial component varus/valgus Anteroposterior slope.Īt T0, 28 patients were included in the FB and 33 in the MB group. Data regarding the implant survivorship and ROM were also collected. The following PROMs were administered at T0 (pre-operatively), T1 (1 year after surgery), and T2 (3 years after surgery): visual analogue scale (VAS), Knee Society Score (KSS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). The first group received FB PKA-PPK® the second received MB PKA-Oxford. The hypothesis of the present study was that MB implants performed better than FB in PKA in octogenarians.
The focus of the present study was on PROMs, range of motion (ROM), implant positioning and implants survivorship.
#Osirix lite download trial
A clinical trial comparing MB (mobile-bearing) versus FB (fixed-bearing) in medial partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) in octagenarians has been conducted.
0 kommentar(er)
